National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones President Erik Autor Testifies at USTR Hearing on Proposed Section 301 Tariffs on Imports from China

May 16, 2018 | By - | Filed in: Press Releases.

National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones President Erik Autor Testifies at USTR Hearing on Proposed Section 301 Tariffs on Imports from China

The link to the original content can be found at the end of our message below.

In the past Forimmediaterelease circulated releases distributed through the Cision and PR Newswire system on a complimentary basis and as a service to our readers.

PR Newswire now claims copyright on press releases distributed through the Cision and PR Newswire system.

Their pitch: “Share your brand’s story around the world,” but that’s where it ends. When eTN, as a media outlet for travel and tourism news, tried to publish a release distributed to journalists by PR Newswire, they were told the release must be removed immediately. In addition, PR Newswire threatened eTurboNews with their legal counsel claiming copyright of releases from PR Newswire or Cision circulates on behalf of clients.

Here is the letter received by eTurboNews from a PR Newswire/Cision director:

“Subject: removal request

Please immediately remove the following posting from your site: [website name removed]

PR Newswire distributed this release on behalf of our client [client name removed]

[company name removed] is understandably upset that the release is posted on your site, tagged with Travel & Tourism Industry release: at the start of the text.

As you can see below in the release that we distributed that we did not include any coding or tagging on our end to indicate that the release is relevant to the Travel & Tourism industry: [website link removed]

Please completely remove the posting from your site as soon as possible, and confirm when complete.

Additionally, I am unable to find a licensing agreement between PR Newswire and eTN, or any other associated websites. If you do have a licensing agreement in which PR Newswire has licensed your sites to publish our content, please send a copy to me as soon as possible.

If you do not have a licensing agreement, we request that you remove all PR Newswire content from all of your sites. If I should have our Counsel send an official request, please let me know to whom it should be resent.

Many thanks,

[name removed]

Director CISION PR Newswire”

It appears PR Newswire is not only charging a steep amount of money from companies wanting their releases circulated through their system to journalists but also is now trying to license this content as their copyrighted material. eTN receives more than 2,000 story ideas on a daily basis, we don’t rely on PR Newswire for content, and for sure we won’t pay them a licensing fee for a ‘privilege’ to publish such content.

We urge everyone using PR Newswire services to take a look at this article explaining their modus of operation and misleading reports: .

PR Newswire is now directly competing with publications. This will result in a drastic drop in pick-ups. They are obviously upset with the attention we received for stoties and the visibility we were able to record way ahead of PR Newswire when it comes to our industry segment.

Journalists of any publication should be warned to consider taking content from PR Newswire or Cision.

Therefore, in the future, if you would like us to consider your press releases for publication, you will need to send it to us directly: For more information, visit: .

As a courtesy to our readers, you can find the original release content  at:



WASHINGTON, May 16, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones (NAFTZ) President Erik Autor today called for establishment of an effective, ongoing product-exclusion-request procedure and other measures in testimony before a hearing convened by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) regarding proposed 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese imports under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act.

While agreeing that China’s intellectual property rights violations, forced technology transfers, and state interventions warrant appropriate action, Autor warned that many internationally competitive companies and industries represented by NAFTZ rely on China and other countries to supply inputs necessary for their U.S. production and include China as a key export market. “Accordingly,” said Autor, “we share the serious concerns of many U.S. business organizations about the adverse consequences Sec. 301 tariffs pose for U.S. manufacturing, exporting, and consuming industries, including creating strong incentives to manufacture abroad as U.S. production costs increase and imported goods become more competitive in the U.S. market.”

Autor warned that the proposed Sec. 301 tariffs threaten to undercut important FTZ program goals, including: 1) sustaining U.S.-based manufacturing and jobs by equalizing duties on U.S.-made and foreign-made products; and 2) eliminating situations where U.S. manufacturers pay significantly more than foreign exporters in U.S. duties because duties on inputs are higher than on the final product.

To mitigate these problems, Autor stated, NAFTZ believes it is essential for the Sec. 301 process and other trade remedies actions to establish an effective, ongoing product-exclusion-request procedure, enabling companies to secure exclusions from duties for certain imported materials, including finished products manufactured in U.S. zones.

Mr. Autor also pointed out that another critical issue for FTZ manufacturers in trade remedies proceedings is that finished goods approved by the U.S. Foreign-Trade Zones Board for zone production must not be incorrectly considered foreign origin for U.S. Customs entry purposes, and must be explicitly exempted from additional tariffs in Presidential Proclamations. NAFTZ’s written comments submitted on May 11 provide an example that illustrates the potential problem and includes recommended Proclamation language to ensure goods finished in a U.S. zone are not inadvertently subject to additional duties.

Turning his attention to the problematic subject of “privileged foreign status” (PF) classification required by the proposed Sec. 301 action, Mr. Autor pointed out that the administration’s proposed action “would require FTZ manufacturers to admit any subject articles into a U.S. zone under ‘privileged foreign status’ and pay the additional duty when the finished product incorporating those articles is entered into U.S. commerce.” In laying out the PF process for FTZs, said Autor, it is essential for the final Sec. 301 proclamation to avoid including language similar to that used in the March 22 Presidential Proclamations on steel and aluminum. Those proclamations stated that any steel or aluminum article admitted into a U.S. foreign-trade zone under PF status prior to the effective date of the duties would be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad valorem rates of duty imposed by those proclamations.

Under U.S. Customs regulations, foreign-status merchandise categorized as having “privileged foreign status” maintains the status it enjoyed upon its admission to a Foreign-Trade Zone. When the merchandise is subsequently shipped from the zone to the U.S. market and entered for consumption by CBP, it is evaluated based on its time-of-admission condition, even though it may have undergone a transformation in the zone.

“NAFTZ is unaware of any past Proclamations containing such language imposing additional duties upon filing a customs entry on merchandise in an FTZ that was under PF status prior to the effective date of such duties,” said Erik Autor. “This condition penalizes FTZ users for manufacturing in the United States and contravenes language in the Foreign-Trade Zones Act and Customs regulations regarding the election of PF status on merchandise in zones.”

Mr. Autor also referred to other technical issues regarding treatment of foreign-trade zone merchandise in the pending Sec. 301 and other trade remedies actions, including additional recommendations for Presidential Proclamation language to provide better and clearer guidance to FTZ manufacturers. Those recommendations are fully detailed in NAFTZ’s May 11 submission of comments which can be downloaded here.  Mr. Autor’s full May 16 testimony can be downloaded here.

The NAFTZ also recently joined with The National Retail Federation and more than 100 other associations in submitting comments to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer outlining how the administration’s proposed tariffs would harm the U.S. economy. The groups urged the administration instead to develop a comprehensive strategy to effectively address China’s unfair trade practices. See here.

NAFTZ is the voice of the U.S. Foreign-Trade Zones program, created by Congress in 1934 to help U.S.-based companies be more globally competitive; maintain U.S.-based activity and jobs; attract investment to American communities; and boost exports through special duty benefits and customs procedures. FTZs account for a significant portion of total U.S. trade – 5.2 percent ($76 billion) of U.S. goods exports and 10.2 percent ($225.3 billion) of U.S. goods imports in 2016. Over 420,000 American workers are employed at FTZs in all fifty states and Puerto Rico.

For More Information Contact:
Jarmila Zapata, NAFTZ
202-331-1950, ext 224  
Brian Hannigan , Smith Dawson & Andrews
202-835-0740, ext 221

Cision View original content with multimedia:

SOURCE National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones




To post and circulate your own press release on FIR and the eTN Network  please click here 


Comments are closed here.